no one is in range plato :P

KP didnt want to bash those 2/3rd alliances, poor buggers.

In fact, we're busy teaching our guys to Grrowww

kp attacked every alliance they could to avoid 35 at that point :D now ofcourse 35 is too big for them :D

yet #35 did not “evade” us and tried to kill us like 4 times, failing dramatically every time.

That's because our good growers left, we now have bad growers - and the only thing left for #35 to kill is the KP pro squad. Trying to kill that generally means a huge fail.

well to your last statement:
KP didnt want to bash those 2/3rd alliances, poor buggers.

is what i ment.. - this is complete rubbish as this is exactly what they did instead of trying to hurt 35

It's normal >_> When OG was on top for so long, it was because no one even tried to kill us. It's a perk for being #1 -_- Fear.

Bolle, failing is part of the game. we have 49% success and 49% dmg since we're not in range. if we'd be in range we'd kill your whole alliance. plus there was some boredom in our last KAs: we were unorganized and you guys weren't a real threat hence the lack of motivation :P

Alliances at war isn't really even about war anyway >_> Kind of like how modern christmas isn't about Christ.

this is alliances at assassination really

too true :( most of the real warring alliances stopped playing long ago. we're left with the afterbirth.

hope ur future hopes come true, soon, very soon...

you shouldn't grow if you want to kill KP redline

there's a nastier problem than war surrendering btw. It's the fact that it's better not to war at all, because of the long term advantages. In classic, when you died your alliance's chances at winning the age were suddenly quite diminished. Here, it's a setback. But losing a couple of tribes is still better than have a drawnout war, especially when your chances are so slim.

Ah well.. just remembering this for now

btw, if u want a real example of how dead war is, albeit for now, check historic war rankings, 2/4 top alliances dont play anymore

technically

are looking forward to heritage change, so that everyone restart at the same acres that will hopefully change the mentality...

there are changes planned for heritage right?

heritage isnt going away, but if its gonna be altered i do not know

I was thinking about this:
Joe's Concept


No heritage
All tribes start at 1000 acres with the exception of newly signed up players: http://aatw-live.rob-franken.nl/suggestions/read/8035/tutorial_mode/. (These start at ~750? with protection and are tutored to ~1000 by attacking bots and the like).

i like the idea of having a rookie “age” i like the concept of heritage as a reward for breaking and living through the 10k barrier, i also think it needs to be reduced

none of this btw has very much to do with current thread

one way to promote wars is that Out of war kills dont generate a negative heritage, but kills during wars make that tribe restart at 400 acres.

Considering most wars ends in 2 minutes not that many would have to restart at 400 acres, but it would trigger more wars atleast.

and no, I dont ppl would like that idea, not sure I like it... but something needs to be done, there are way to few wars around :P

heritage doesnt really affect wars, and wars were suffering long before heritage

come in our range and you will have plenty of wars ;)

i assume ur either CD or KP?

When I started playing aatw the heritage was rather simple, if you got killed you had to restart at 400 acres.

But I was not in a big alliance at that moment, and my memory is not the best. So i dont remember if there where lots of wars back then, but if it was not many wars back then... then we should probably change the name of the game cause it is rather misleading, perhaps call it Orkfia Random Kill And Lots Of Growth instead.

Seriously, I hope the new market system make wars more benefital, so that alliances acctually benefit from warring alot.

i already made my alliances at assassination joke earlier...but were working on something right now to hopefully promote real warring so ill report on whether it is a success or not