pfff i know #35 are annoying but using bugs to kill one of them is just lame..

we didnt need any yesterday

yes, u did. there is a bug and as soon as HaRRy is available hopefully it will be fixed!

The combined strength shouldn't be more than say 120% of the larger alliance so that number two and three ranked alliances can't just enter an unholy alliance to dethrone the number one alliance.

that is called coop and it's against the coc. 24 vs 12 is just stupid imo

redline i am TIRED of you calling people's ideas “stupid”

u R STUPID

and are u guys insinuating 71 abused a bug? a bug that no one realized existed?

nope, there is no bug. it's just an error in the design. that's why I insist that DEV looks into it :)

and that idea is really stupid. this game isn't based on strength. I don't have the time or the mood to spam the forum so I just call it how I see it. if u cannot understand the logic behind the mechanics of the game ... that's not really my fault

Cheers

I blame lepel for taking more than normal damage in a raze

im with redline... is not a bright idea to bring co-op into the game, if you havent got enough teamwork to take #1, then dont bother. wont get better with more people.

that's not the point- redline u should not be so offensive- u just may cause someone to not share an idea or an opinion- get off your high horse ender!

this kind of ideas shouldn't be shared. 24 vs 12 is just !@#$#%$@$#@ better balance the game!

^^ Sits back and rolls a fatty while ^^^^ looking at all the carnage that one ^^^^ post caused.

It was supposed to be a funny. DAM* YOU GUYS accompanied by an angry fist shake. But it was ment in good humor. Its a game, 35 is stomping ass right now. Whoopdie :). I dooo think more players is always a good idea though. More players = more targets afterall

First blame me then blame the staff for imbalancing... manners manners. Disregarding you thinking my idea is crap, im a big boy and can allow you to have your opinion without bashing you. You raise a concern about not having enough team work. Well how can a number two alliance take down the number one when the one is superior in all ways and can be just as active without the two and three cooping?
Thanks mazja for being the voice of reason and at least hearing my crappy idea out. and to answer redline, 24 tribes split into two alliances making up some combination of 60% the size of the larger tribe means that these smaller tribes are much smaller than the larger alliance's tribes. Hence the 120% size cap modifier that I stated earlier in case you missed that for the collation of alliances. This is mearly to bring up this conversation because we all know that it is an issue of having super dominant alliances, coopping, and so we can talk about solutions of which all I've heard are complaints of imbalance and lack of team work and no solutions.

sharing is one thing, but outright belittleing is not acceptable- and some do this continually and i'm tired of it-you can post dislike or disapproval about an idea or suggestion in creative construction without attacking the person themself-

Kill ALL THE COOP peeps and stop bitchin already geeze. DEATH TO THEM ALL!!!

Ummm wait whats the topis again?Sry got carried away

lol everyone just stop complaining, number can on only hold number for so long, and there's no rule against other alliances targeting different tribes in the top alliance

take a kitkat

#17 are noobs bleh.

Hrms.
.goes back to sleep

arent we all chonka? :P

not if you hand me a kitkat bar..You jive suckers! How the hell you gonna talk about kitkats after i rolled that blunt earlier?

cause blunts cause munchies

Let me explain from my point of view why your idea has no real implementation in orkfia.

First of all you are making a misstake thinking that the land difference would be a huge disadvantage for the smaller ally while it will be an advantage for the bigger once - that's by far not true. I don't know if either you don't know the game or you got carried away in your suggestion but land is not THAT important. For reference you can ask 17 if it was easy on them when 3 times smaller ally tried to kill them and how easy was to retaliate.

Second - a tribe will have hard time surviving if an 12 man ally organizes and ops together. A well defended tribe will be close to death with 12 tribes opping it (not dead but close). IMO it will be next to impossible to survive 24 tribes that are opping you together. Have a 10k viking for example and imagine that he is being opped by 24 4k land light elfs... what would happen? You think he has any chance?
What you are suggesting here is not a nice to have feature but a way for the smaller allies to wreck havoc on the bigger once without any chance of actually messing something up and with an enormously huge penalty for the retaliating bigger ally.

To sum up - I am strongly against your idea (I am not calling it stupid but I believe that the idea is just not acceptable for the game mechanics of orkfia that we currently have).

Maybe and just maybe if there were some caps to the united allies, like 40% reduced damage(they still got that 10% extra from joining up) or at least a cap where they cannot op the same target your idea would have made much more sense.

I don't think anyone cares what you think ScorpiAS

/me splits CD into 2 allis and tells them to stay small

Most mature comment ever. Dont you have homework to write?

i like comments like those. it makes me feel mature